Dr Jarrod Gilbert Sociologist
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Research
  • s27 Reports
  • Contact

Crime Costs - Research Counts

18/4/2014

1 Comment

 
If we imprison young people then we need to get used to doing it. Almost 90 percent of prisoners under twenty will be re-convicted within five years or release. Seventy percent will find themselves back in prison. Recidivism rates drop significantly for people aged 40 or over. It's a long time to wait.

Statistics be damned, though. Make every statistic a victim and things become more significant. Yip, there's a massive financial cost (each prisoner costs more than $90,000 per year), but the social cost is immeasurable. We need to move beyond ideas of punishing criminals and think about future victims. If what we are doing is creating more victims then it clearly isn't a success.

I've been asked many times what might work, and while much of my fieldwork in other areas has given me some anecdotal answers, it's only recently that I've undertaken research to prove them.

One of those projects evaluated a reintegration strategy employed by Pathway Trust, and this showed some promising results in employing wrap-around service provision (I will write specifically about that soon). Another project highlighted the very simple and astounding gaps in rehabilitation efforts (I will write about this in detail when we're done, too).

Perhaps my most important study, though, is just beginning. A team from Interdependent Research Solutions and Zavest are finding and interviewing people who were imprisoned at younger than 20 who have not been re-convicted for at least five years. We are hoping to learn what worked for them so it can be employed on others. If it doesn't sound exciting, I assure you It is.

Only when the public (read voters) demand a more evidence led approach will we get it. And for this reason I can only implore this: reject those politicians who offer simple solutions to obviously complex phenomena. We need to discard the idea of being tough on crime and replace it with being smart on crime.

Some people will invariably misconstrue my words, so let me be clear: in no way does that mean we need to go ‘soft’. For example, I firmly believe in protecting the community through preventative detention (indeterminate sentences), but statistically those cases are small. I also believe that prison is an important tool of punishment (we do, after all, need our pound of flesh). There is absolutely no doubt, however, that we need to find a way of reducing crime and not just punishing it.

Given we are all potential victims, it’s in our interests to find a better way of tackling crime. Politicians please take note.

1 Comment
cvcentre link
1/10/2020 07:48:06 pm

Because of the laws like Insight Policing, the distance between the police officers and commoners is continuously being accelerated. We should try to do something that could be helpful in lessening the differences.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Disclaimer

    I reserve the right to change my mind in the face of superior evidence.

    Sponsored by

    Picture

    Picture

    WINNER: BEST BLOG

    Archives

    April 2022
    October 2019
    March 2018
    February 2018
    August 2017
    June 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly